Same tools A, B and C, but minus tools D, E and F, and with a smaller chance that any tools at all will even be used.
replyNot claiming that it's a slam dunk for open source, but the inverse does not seem correct either.
> Same tools A, B and C, but minus tools D, E and F,
replyWhy "minus D, E and F"? After all, once you have the harness set up, there's no additional work to add in new models, right?
The point being that there are always going to be more eyes, and more knowledge of available tools (i.e. including "D, E and F"), and more experience using them, with open source than with a single in-house dev team.
replyThere's no more "eyes" though, it's all models, and they are all converging pretty damn fast.
replyIf true then logically it will be sufficient to run this "master model" once before any code release for the level playing field to be restored. After all, even open-source software is private until it is released.
replyFair enough
reply