upvote

points

by FireBeyond6 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby hypeatei6 hours ago|
next
[-]
This exactly. It's like everyone is assuming whatever ICE ordered Google to do was completely lawful. Even if this administration was a tightly run ship, when an agency gets a massive funding increase and daily quotas to hit like ICE did, all bets are off and you should never give them the benefit of the doubt. Obviously when the DHS secretary is calling American protesters domestic terrorists, cosplaying as a cop, and spending $200M+ on ads that feature herself, then you definitely give maximum scrutiny to everything that agency is doing/did.
reply
upvoteby fn-mote5 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Cited elsewhere in this thread. [1]

> First, numerous other individuals have challenged recent administrative subpoenas in court after receiving notice, and the Department of Homeland Security has withdrawn those subpoenas before reaching a court decision.

They don't want a ruling against them.

> [The subpoena would have been quashed because] there are facial deficiencies in the subpoena, including that the subpoena is missing a “Title of Proceeding.”

[1]: https://www.eff.org/files/2026/04/13/eff_letter_re_google_no...

reply
upvoteby Spooky236 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
The article pointed this out as well, but notably did not state that Google had in fact received an administrative subpoena.
reply
upvoteby cheriot5 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
From the article

> In April 2025, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sent Google an administrative subpoena requesting his data.

reply
upvoteby bannable5 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
fta

> In September 2024, Amandla Thomas-Johnson was a Ph.D. candidate studying in the U.S. on a student visa when he briefly attended a pro-Palestinian protest. In April 2025, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sent Google an administrative subpoena requesting his data.

reply
upvoteby 5 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
deleted
reply