upvote
The fact that we're only hearing one side is suspicious enough
reply
That’s rather generic…

Do you apply that principle universally in your life?

C’mon, be honest about why you doubt the story.

reply
Yeah I apply that principle.

To be honest, it's that plus the fact that this article omits things we already know. It wasn't just that he "attended a pro-Palestine protest at Cornell University," they shut down a jobs fair. I went to a liberal college too, I know that a lot of these "peaceful" protests are actually quite forceful and infringe on others' rights more than anyone ever reports.

My bias is in the other direction if anything. The author was protesting the US involvement with Israel, and even if he did something wrong, I believe he was targeted for this reason only. If you ask me, Israel has way too much control over US politics and other institutions. AIPAC and ADL ought to be classified as foreign entities because they de facto represent Israel's govt here, and there are some people in those orgs I consider outright traitors to the USA because they're making us pay taxes to a small country overseas. We need like a Tea Party 3.0 (unfortunately 2.0 already happened).

reply
Thank you for elaborating. Now I understand where you are coming from better.

It’s a huge pet peeve of mine when people don’t say what they are actually thinking :)

reply
ICE is free to speak. I don't think they have interest to explain why they hunt someone.
reply
It's true, by not speaking ICE loses some credibility, but they won't speak even when they're right.
reply
Nor, I assume, do they have any interest to explain how they hunt someone.
reply
[dead]
reply