> I'm imagining you're doing it because that's how Anthropic prefers to frame it
replyCorrect.
> would it be valid to interpret that as an attack as well?
Yup.
If you ask claude in chinese it thinks its deepseek.
replyI don't think that learning from textbooks to take an exam and learning from the answers of another student taking the exam are the same.
replyJoking aside, I also don't believe that maximum access to raw Internet data and its quantity is why some models are doing better than Google. It seems that these SoTA models gain more power from synthetic data and how they discard garbage.
Firehosing Anthropic to exfiltrate their model seems materially different than Anthropic downloading all of the Internet to create the model in the first place to me. But maybe that's just me?
replyI don't see the material difference in firehosing anthropic vs anthropic firehosing random sites on the internet. As someone who runs a few of those random sites, I've had to take actions that increase my costs (and burn my time) to mitigate a new host of scrapers constantly firing at every available endpoint, even ones specifically marked as off limits.
replyYeah, it's different. Anthropic profits when it delivers tokens. Hosting providers pay when Anthropic scrapes them.
replyYes, what the LLM providers did was worse and impacted people financially a whole lot more in lost compensation for works as well as operational costs that would never reach the heights they did solely because of scrapers on behalf of model providers.
reply