upvote

points

by Someone12349 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby chewz7 hours ago|
next
[-]
7.5 is promotional rate, it will go up to 25. And in May you will be switched to per token billing.

Opus 4.5 and 4.6 will be removed very soon.

So what is your contingency plan?

reply
upvoteby carlinm6 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
Are you saying github copilot is switching to a per token billing model? If so, you have a link to that?
reply
upvoteby Someone12346 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Can you link to a source for anything you're claiming?
reply
upvoteby slopinthebag6 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
https://github.blog/changelog/2026-04-16-claude-opus-4-7-is-...

> Over the coming weeks, Opus 4.7 will replace Opus 4.5 and Opus 4.6 in the model picker for Copilot Pro+.

> This model is launching with a 7.5× premium request multiplier as part of promotional pricing until April 30th

TBF, it's a rumour that they are switching to per-token price in May, but it's from an insider (apparently), and seeing how good of a deal the current per-request pricing is, everyone expects them to bump prices sometime soon or switch to per-token pricing.

reply
upvoteby phainopepla24 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
The per-request pricing is ridiculous (in a good way, for the user). You can get so much done on a single prompt if you build the right workflow. I'm sure they'll change it soon
reply
upvoteby p1necone3 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Yeah it seems insane that it's priced this way to me too. Using sonnet/opus through a ~$40 a month copilot plan gives me at least an order of magnitude more usage than a ~$40 a month claude code plan (the usage limits on the latter are so low that it's effectively not a viable choice, at least for my use cases).

The models are limited to 160k token context length but in practice that's not a big deal.

Unless MS has a very favourable contract with Anthropic or they're running the models on their own hardware there's no way they're making money on this.

reply
upvoteby slopinthebag2 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Yeah, you can even write your own harness that spawns subagents for free, and get essentially free opus calls too. Insane value, I'm not at all surprised they're making changes. Oh well. It was a pain in the ass to use Copilot since it had a slightly different protocol and oauth so it wasn't supported in a lot of tools, now I'm going to go with Ollama cloud probably, which is supported by pretty much everything.
reply
upvoteby GaryBluto8 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
Microsoft are going to be removing Opus 4.5 and 4.6 from Copilot soon so I'd enjoy the lower cost while it lasts.
reply
upvoteby 5 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
deleted
reply
upvoteby bwat499 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
in copilot I find it hard to justify using opus at even 3x vs just using GPT 5.4 high at 1x
reply
upvoteby d01006 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
I went from plan with opus, implement with claude, to simply plan and implement with GPT 5.4

It's a very good model for a very good price

reply
upvoteby solenoid09377 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
I don't know how you guys are not seeing 4.7 as an upgrade, it just does so much more, so much better. I guess lower complexity tasks are saturated though.
reply
upvoteby _puk6 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Anecdotally, been leaning on 4.6 heavily, and today 4.7 hallucinated on some agentic research it was doing. Not seen it do that before.

When pushed it did the 'ol "whoopsie, silly me"; turned out the hallucination had been flagged by the agent and ignored by Opus.

Makes it hard to trust it, which sucks as it's a heavy part of my workflow.

reply