upvote
I'm the Founder at https://shaders.com. Not frustrating at all, and Basement is an excellent team. Shader Lab looks like a solid tool for exploration and and creating effects, nothing slop about it (although I love the word "slopfork", that's new).

Our platform goes above and beyond that with a large collection of Pro presets and a unique capability in our component-based approach with reactive props, and of course broader framework support. All that, and our new MCP workflow for having your agent prompt effects, and we feel confident in our place in the market.

Would recommend checking out both Shader Lab AND shaders.com to anyone interested in creative shader effects for the web.

reply
Ah nice! I enjoyed trying out your product when it was launched which called this app to mind. Commendable attitude!
reply
I'm not your target audience, but why do you gate your playground?

Went to try it and then gave up after it asked me to sign up/log in

reply
Mostly due to account-tied permissions, such as asset uploads (images, video, etc) and for auto-saving/versioning.

It's entirely free to try, build, etc with an account - you only need a paid license when you're ready to export/deploy

reply
[dead]
reply
There are dozens of DCCs where you have a UI where you stack things (over-compositing, bottom to top).

And when you select one of these things you can change the parameters.

If this is a 'slopfork' of shaders.com then the latter is a 'slopfork' of <insert any DCC that had this pattern and existed before and has whatever anyone may consider 'less sloppy'>.

OTTOMH: AfterEffects, Cavalry, Substance Designer's Layer panel, Tixl's layered textures, ...

reply
Honest question: If my web browser struggles to even render the preview, why in god's name would I put any of these presets on a production webpage?
reply
Please, don't. I don't want the same starting to happen on different sites...
reply
They look nothing alike except they are both about shaders.

Could you explain why you think this is a slopfork?

reply
Did you try the shader.com shader editor where you stack shaders and effects in layers? V similar approach!
reply
so does Photoshop and thousand other visual editing tools. Hardly a reason to claim it to be a copy. Also "slopfork" seems harsh considering it seems limited, but well designed imo.
reply
Maybe a little harsh yes. But compare these screenshots of the two products/features

https://imgur.com/a/41BybD1

reply
I see a deep tree and a shallow tree in the two screenshots, representative of entirely different approaches.
reply
"slopfork" nice
reply
I heard the term used on the shoptalk podcast about cloudflare slopforking wordpress!

https://shoptalkshow.com/709/

reply
Cloudflare really doesn't seem to have made slop or a fork.
reply
I think it’s a jokey term for when you use ai to copy an existing project
reply
No matter what, it's better than "vibecoding." Ugh.
reply
Welcome to the world of zero cost software we were promised
reply
Indeed we prefer the world where only deep-pocketed entrenched monopolies can do this.
reply