upvote
Part of that cost is from ITER being so huge, which is because they use obsolete superconductors. CFS is doing the same thing in a reactor a tenth as big, using newer superconductors that support stronger magnetic fields.

The size and also the complicated governance have made ITER very slow to build, which also increases expense. The JET tokamak is about the size of the reactor CFS is building, and JET was built in a year for the reactor itself, plus three years before that for the building they put it in.

reply
I think a lot of the cost is custom parts. Standardization and economy of scale would bring the price down quite a bit.
reply
If that happens it will still take decades.

It took us a lot of time to standardize computers. We made lots of weird architectures before things settled down.

reply
The market never went that way with fission (except France?). What would be the difference with fusion?
reply