upvote
So the benefits are that something that was already being mass produced with no issue is slightly easier to mass produce?

It's not a particularly compelling argument.

reply
No, the benefits are that something can be mass produced magnitudes faster and easier, which in turn also creates more latitude for creativity and new spaces.

It's a true state-change, which makes the argument pretty compelling IMO.

reply
Weird how it's the least creative people who use it then.
reply
No idea why you were down voted, I think that's exactly how this will get used.

I'm already imagining this is how the local live indie band night I sometimes go to will generate poster images each week for the bands that are playing, whether to put up at the venue or post to social media. And the bands might be using it to design images to put on their t-shirts and other merch. I already know some indie bands using this stuff for their album covers.

reply
He's getting downvoted because none of these supposed "benefits" outweigh the costs.
reply
Downvotes because nobody actually wants this. Those image uses serve a purpose to an external audience. The audience doesn't want this shit.

Now of course I'm being dramatically absolute. I'm sure I already consume these things without knowing it. These things serve a function. Offloading to AI is the implementer admitting they can't be bothered to care whether it serves the function.

reply
deleted
reply
How do these justify the costs to society?
reply
The 'costs to society' are massively overblown, and some of them (automating jobs) are actually benefits to society.
reply
Nothing says benefiting society like increasing unemployment, destroying what little trust was left in society, and allowing for CSAM and racist propaganda to be generated en masse. At least some corporations will save a few bucks.
reply
The girls that have to deal with their classmates generating nudes of them for the rest of time are glad to hear that their concerns are "overblown".
reply
Nobody tell those girls about Photoshop, or scissors and glue.
reply
[flagged]
reply
There's some rich irony in accusing somebody who disagrees with you of acting in "bad faith" because you disagree with them.
reply
Ok.
reply