> Doesn't have to be. You can train it on normal pictures of children and nude images of adults.
replyYou say this so casually, as though it were a normal thing to know, or as if a normal person would know it. Does that actually seem true where you live right now?
And how do you know that, anyway, Harsh? I mean, all those "unblocked" games you stole to give away and that you also put on Github, that's one thing. But this...
Come on, it's not hard to come up with this idea. And it's not even true, model trained on clothed children and nude adults wouldn't know how children's genitals look like.
replyThis conversation just keeps getting more and more normal, huh.
replyMaybe you can explain why it is that, whenever lately I'm less than perfectly accurate on the technical requirements of using AI to generate kiddie porn, an entire legion of creepy anons comes pouring out of the woodwork to well-actually and bikeshed and bullshit about it? Are you really so anxious to prove your empiricism superior in this?