upvote
> How is a VSCode fork and a open weight LLM fine-tune worth $60B?

Ignoring future business ideas, Cursor reported reached $2 billion+ annualized revenue run rate in 2026, doubling from 2025. Recent financing rounds reached high-end valuation between $30 billion and $50 billion.

reply
Revenue without expenses is meaningless. Annualized revenue is even worse. It's like a gambler bragging that they spin through $20,000 a month. Yeah, but for how long?

If you give me a billion, I can do an annualized revenue run rate of ~$12 billion just by selling a dollar for 99 cents.

reply
“annualized revenue run rate” is a bogus accounting term. It’s like taking a paycheck and multiplying it by 365. Notice the complete lack of any mention of profits.
reply
a lot of companies I know are cancelling Cursor in favor of Claude Code or Codex

because they already have VSCode or IntelliJ for edits

reply
A lot of enterprises were doing that but now they hit the 150 user limit on Claude and are paying seat+api rates.

Codex is still going strong but it’s hard to imagine they won’t do similar eventually.

So now im honestly hearing a lot more folk stick it out with cursor while waiting for the dust to settle.

reply
>A lot of enterprises were doing that but now they hit the 150 user limit on Claude and are paying seat+api rates.

A lot of enterprises use Github Copilot which has per-request pricing model which effectively means unlimited tokens which eliminates this issue.

reply
yeah i just canceled my cursor sub and switched back to vscode. work pays for my claude max sub, no point paying for cursor anymore when i can just use openrouter every few months to test other models if i want
reply
I mean the best argument I see for cursor is that you can easily switch between AIs, which is convenient since they seem to run at 80-90% up time (with those 10-20% clustered at West coast working hours). But the big AI companies are likely to keep an edge over Open-source fine-tunes and they are able to subsidize the coding agents in a way Cursor can't.
reply
Yes, and Whatsapp was just a messaging app with a stupid Erlang backend. These deals are not about the tech, they buy the business, that includes the brand and the user base. Whether we think it's worth that amount is indeed up for discussion.
reply
Yes. But unlike cursor, Whatsapp had the following advantages:

1. It's cheap to run. 2. It has clear advantages over existing technology (SMS). 3. My mom uses it. She's never use cursor. Whatsapp had a huge username in Europe. Basically everyone I know uses it.

And it was "only" ~$20 billion. Inflation can't be this high.

reply
Whatsapp was much much more at that point. It also had a huge userbase at a time when getting such a number of people was incredibly difficult. Many were also paying the $1 per year fee. Switching from Cursor to Kilo etc. takes nothing. There are no "friends" you need to convince to switch.
reply
Whatsapp was already the de-facto communication standard for a lot countries in America and Europe when Meta bought it.
reply
WhatsApp had real network effects built in, and network was the moat. Don’t think Cursor has any real moat.
reply
I don't think it's about worth any more at this point; it seems more about money laundry and manipulating the market. They are shifting power between each other and create an illusion of a healthy economy, not carrying about the damage they create for everyone else.
reply
[flagged]
reply
People that think a crappy vscode fork is worth 60 billion dollars are the ones that need to touch grass.
reply
clankerlover
reply
deleted
reply
You have to look at it now like cryptocurrency “market cap” numbers. It’s more of a marketing tool than anything. This is just another honking whirlygig to bolt onto the SpaceX IPO to try and generate exit liquidity
reply
> How is a VSCode fork and an open weight LLM fine-tune worth $60B?

Corporate contracts. A lot of companies have signed onto Cursor. xAI has a pretty toxic brand with Elon and the nonconsensual sexual images scandal. xAI has a ton of compute and few corporate customers. Now they have a ton.

> One would think Elon would learn his lesson after overpaying for Twitter

I think he took over Twitter to control what people using it see and promote right wing viewpoints. To that end it’s been a wild success.

reply
> xAI has a ton of compute and few corporate customers. Now they have a ton.

For now, perhaps. I work with numerous companies who refuse to do business with his brands.

reply
Yes, I think getting value for money here relies on a lot of corporate inertia. Which, to be honest, is usually a good bet.
reply
> How is a VSCode fork and a open weight LLM fine-tune worth $60B?

The same way a rocket company that counts short-lived as satellites as an asset is worth 1.7 trillion. Congratulations to the Cursor folks, they are the only winners in this.

This is also part of the AI bubble delusion: agent assisted coding works, at least for some people, for some purposes. This deal perpetuates the illusion that AI will find high value use cases. The reality may be that software development has unique characteristics you won't find in law or medicine or other domains.

reply
Buying Twitter played a key part in getting Trump re-elected, so I think Musk figures he got what he wanted in terms of deregulation, dropped prosecution, and damage to his political opponents.

This deal is different: SpaceX is heading for an IPO which is now complicated by xAI becoming a subsidiary. Cursor is actually popular and I’m sure this is all stock-based so as long as investors believe that those users stick to xAI it’ll juice the entire SpaceX IPO. I am skeptical but these days the market seems to be driven by a country-club full of guys in Connecticut who are constantly hyperventilating on X so maybe from that angle it’s just another way he’s getting what he wanted from Twitter.

reply
Quoting a viral tweet: “Elon is such a dumbass, he spent $44 billion on Twitter and all he got was control of all 3 branches of the federal government.”
reply
Let's face it - Grok is not nearly as popular among programmers as Claude or Codex, and that means that xAI is not able to vacuum all the data that his competitors have access to.

Cursor is installed on a LOT of computers.

Once Grok becomes the default engine, it will raise adoption.

More importantly, if you have Cursor installed all your data may be sent to their labs whether you use it or not (unfortunately - this is par for the course for all the LLMs, a la Microsoft).

That's worth a lot - especially considering that Cursor might also grow with the shift to more powerful local models and the fact that it has a respectable income stream.

reply
he doesn't act like he regrets buying Twitter/X/Xitter

maybe he's getting value from this? (also the deal was essentially secured with Tesla stock, so who knows what did he actually pay)

reply
branding ... mindshare
reply
Ever heard of concept called acqui-user/acqui-hire?
reply