In a clockless cpu design you'd indeed expect xor to be faster. But in a regular CPU with a clock you either waste a bit of xor performance by making xor and sub both take the same number of ticks, or you speed up the clock enough that the speed difference between xor and sub justifies sub being at least a full tick slower
replyThe former just seems way more practical
Even if they take the same number of ticks, shouldn't xor fundamentally needing less work also mean it can be performed while drawing less power/heating less, which is just as much an improvement in the long run?
replyThat wasn’t much of a concern in the 70s and 80s.
reply