>Third world
replyNon-aligned countries didn't exist? Sorry I need some coffee and I'm feeling a little thick at the moment.
They did exist the same way people and goods did travel across Eurasia, but it wasn't some defined political or economical entity and they did not call themselves "the third world"
replyIs that the meaning of “Third World”? As in East/West/Other?
replyI always thought it was more about Developed/Developing/Undeveloped, mostly in terms of the industrial transition.
But, if we are being honest, it’s used a lot more as “third class”.
I suppose indeed that it is not really a well defined “thing”, like the Silk Road.
When originally coined (circa 1950 around the Korean War), the First World was the US aligned block of countries, the Second World was the USSR aligned block of countries, and the Third World was all of the countries not part of either. Egypt, India, Yugoslavia, Ghana and Indonesia viewed themselves as leaders of the broader political movement during the 1960's and 1970's.
replyEven into the 1960's there were few industrialized nations outside of those two main blocks, so "Third World" quickly lost its explicitly political meaning and became more a description of the level of capital investment and worker productivity.