Exactly, that could widen the blast radius of this particular compromise significantly.
replyRead the article
replyWhere does it answer this question in the article?
replykinda crazy to see this comment required in this particular context, yet here we are
replyIt's an understandable question, the article reads like an AI generated mess.
replyThe article explains what is extracted.
replyThe article waffles on forever and gives some generic advice.
replyMeanwhile, Bitwarden themselves state that end users were almost never affected: https://community.bitwarden.com/t/bitwarden-statement-on-che...
You had to install the CLI through NPM at a very short time frame for it to be affected. If you did get infected, you have to assume all secrets on your computer were accessed and that any executable file you had write access to may be backdoored.
No it doesn't?
replyYes it does, under technical analysis. I don’t want to paste it here when it’s laid out in the article…
replyIt seems to be describing what the Checkmarx vulnerability allows to be done on a GitHub Actions runner?
replyNo, at least according to Bitwarden themselves: https://community.bitwarden.com/t/bitwarden-statement-on-che...
reply