The data clearly shows that productivity growth is flat or even declining. What is your accounting of why software hasn't offset those numbers?
replyYou don't have a counterfactual to suggest that it would have continued increasing had it not been for technology. Is there _any_ credible economist who suggests that we might have higher productivity without tech?
replyThere is no counterfactual needed. Productivity growth has declined, despite the expectation that software would accelerate productivity. I'm asking you why this didn't happen.
replyThere is a counterfactual needed because it is not clear whether the growth would not have declined even more without Software.
replyAgain I'm asking - is there a single credible economist who says that the growth would have been higher without technology?
I'm not even proposing that growth would have been higher without "technology". I said information technology has not increased productivity growth compared to the past. This is an observation of fact.
reply> Productivity metrics were better when businesses were run on just pen and paper
replyThis is what you said.
Again, that is a simple observation of fact. No counterfactual needed. I said it had confounding factors, and I offered hypotheses
replyI asked you for alternative hypotheses and you've offered none.
Is there a way to mute people who are clearly AI boosters? ^
reply? you are literally commenting on the release of a new model from OpenAI in a tech focused community. Have you considered what should be normal here?
reply