upvote
To use an analogy, to add to everybody else: it's like rings on a tree stump. The innermost part of the stump is the oldest; the outer the youngest. Earth is on one of those in-between rings, neither the oldest nor the newest - doesn't matter which of the in-betweens, to be honest.

Suppose now that you're an ant on the middle ring of that tree stump. No matter which way you're looking from Earth's middle-ring, either the rings will get gradually older and then younger with increasing distance (if you're looking towards the center-ish), or the rings will get strictly younger (if you're looking away from the center-ish).

This analogy obviously breaks down if you delve into details but that should give a better intuition to what's going on.

reply
When does "starting in the center" mean anything besides "starting in the center"?

The earth is not the center of the galaxy

reply
The Earth is where the astronomers are. If they are looking outward (away from the center) then the further they look, the younger the stars.
reply
He didn't say that. He said earth is nearer to the center of a spiral arm.
reply
What does the center of a spiral arm have to do with the center of the galaxy?
reply
I don't know but that's not what I'm talking about.
reply
the location of earth has precisely zero to do with the topic
reply
And your reply has zero to do with what I'm talking about.
reply
I actually am not following what the ambiguity is - stars farther out from the center are younger, no?
reply
The Earth isn't the center of the galaxy, so this feels confusing/confused:

> So, as a general rule, the farther out astronomers look, the younger the stars are.

reply
The father out from the center of the galaxy they look, the younger the stars are.
reply
The location of the Earth is completely irrelevant. "closer" and "farther" refer to the center of the galaxy.
reply
Poorly phrased. The most recent stars are on the edges. The inner stars were first, hence the “working outwards”.
reply
But why? Star forms when enough hydrogen (or maybe also helium) clusters together with gravity to spark fusion IIRC. The center of Milky way ain't some ultra dense place where stars are just trillions of kms from each other to support somehow earlier star formation.

Or did ie dark matter/energy somehow coalesce on the outer edge later? Milky way is supposed to be very old place, almost as old as universe itself so one would expect more homogeneous distribution, at least as a layperson.

reply
You need certain density to start formation progress. Then you get more density as it drags more stuff via gravity from intergalactic void. So new stars form at edges when there is finally enough stuff pulled by gravity of whole galaxy to there for the formation to happen.

It seems that you need quite large concentrations(as in scale of whole universe average) to actually get to star formation. Otherwise stars would be uniform trough the universe.

Then again I am not astronomer.

reply
Looking from Earth at the stars closer to the center of a galaxy, they are found to be older. Looking from Earth at the stars closer to the edge of a galaxy, they are found to be younger.
reply
deleted
reply
Earth isn't relevant. The stars at the center of the galaxy developed first, and development proceeded from the inside out, so the youngest stars are on the edge ... then they get older from there on out, as the stars beyond the edge broke away from the galaxy. The bottom of the age U is the location of the formative edge.
reply
From Earth (where astronomers are) looking "out"ward (away from the bulge).
reply
Try: "the farther out [from the center] astronomers look"
reply
It is beyond obvious what they mean.
reply
[dead]
reply