upvote
It won't get that far.

It's physically impossible to build out the datacenters required for the "AI is actually good and we have mass layoffs" scenario. This Anthropic investment is spurred on because they've already hit a brick wall with capacity.

$40B goes a long way, but not for datacenters where nearly every single component and service is now backordered. Even if you could build the DC, the power connection won't be there.

The current oil crisis just makes all of that even worse.

reply
We pretty much already had the layoffs, at least that's my perception.

The next level of layoffs is probably still 25 years out.

reply
> The next level of layoffs is probably still 25 years out.

Hasn't even been 25 years years since the previous layoffs before the current ones.

reply
There's layoffs, certainly.

But all the economic indicators suggest those are "bad economy" layoffs dressed up as "AI" layoffs to keep the shareholders happy.

reply
Do you mean as in there will be no happy ending / reset and no another century of prosperity?
reply
I mean as in living through the industrial revolution would have been wild. So whether we have an AI revolution or an AI bubble it's bound to be a roller coaster.

And that's without accounting for the various wars (and resultant economic impacts) that are already in progress. A large part of what drove the meat grinder of WWI was (very approximately) the various actors repeatedly misjudging the overall situation and being overly enthusiastic to try out their shiny new weapons systems. If one or more superpowers decide to have a showdown the only thing that might minimize loss of life this time around is (ironically enough) the rise of autonomous weapons systems. Even in that case as we know from WWII the logical outcome is a decimated economy and manufacturing sector regardless of anything else that might happen.

reply
> minimize loss of life this time around is (ironically enough) the rise of autonomous weapons systems

I think that just means the relative civilian loss of life will increase once again.

reply
What strategic merit is there in targeting civilians or life critical infrastructure in a fully automated battlebot scenario? Perhaps it's naive but I would expect stockpiles, datacenters, and any key infrastructure on which the local semiconductor fabrication depends to be the primary targets.
reply
The current reality doesn't match your expectations. Russia is using automated warfare to strike what are primarily human life-critical targets.
reply
Look au Ukraine for answers and how russians target almost purely civilian infrastructure and civilians in terror campaigns every single day and night, same as nazis did to Britain in WWII. With exactly same results but they just double down and send more drones next day.

russia is really and empire of the dumb and subjugated serfs at this point (again, history repeats), but they are far from only such place.

Dont expect more, most people are not that nice when SHTF.

reply
Bubble or revolution - not a dichotomy.

Bubbles like the AI bubble are a game theoretic outcome of a revolution. Many players invest heavily to avoid losing, but as a whole the market over invests. This leads to a bubble.

reply
Imagine you're a typesetter and they just invented computerized printing.
reply