There is a rule for marathons to counter wind assistance, but it's basically that the finish of the race needs to be pretty close to the start.

Can't wait for vacuum track racing on the moon.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00421-010-1410-1

Never thought I'd see the day ragebait made it to HN. Yes, let's pretend doing a long jump on the moon is comparable to running a marathon at its prescheduled time at its prescheduled location. Weather is always a factor in sports that take place outside. Might as well put asterisks on all accomplishments that took place on sunny days by your logic right?

A moon long jump would happen in a vacuum, so it should be fine, yes?

No point to point courses are eligible, because of the "risk" of a wind assist.

Human response to temperature shows significant variation. 50F/10C may be absolutely ideal for one runner, but a little too cold for another. That's why you can't unambiguously declare a given race to be "a good weather day".

By contrast, hail/rain and wind will negatively impact almost everyone, which is why talking about "a bad weather day" makes more sense.

Why do you think the existing records weren't also set under good conditions?

What was the temperature and humidity for the previous record? Or the rest of the top 10?

> I just said it needs an asterisk, not withholding anything

It’s essentially the same as not setting the record. It would be qualified every single time it’s mentioned and be functionally saying “…so it doesn’t count.”