upvote
I'm curious, do you recall if they gave any technical details about how they thought about AGI? Like, was it based on neural networks or something else, like symbolic AI?

Asking because, reading the tea leaves from the outside, until ChatGPT came along, MSFT (via Bill Gates) seemed to heavily favor symbolic AI approaches. I suspect this may be partly why they were falling so far behind Google in the AI race, which could leverage its data dominance with large neural networks.

So based on the current AI boom, MSFT may have been chasing a losing strategy with symbolic AI, but if they were all-in on NN, they were on the right track.

reply
Let me just repeat that: "Microsoft" came to your school in 2002 and "confidently stated" that AI had been solved. Really interesting story.
reply
Yes, they did. We had guest speakers from Microsoft talking about AI. AI has been a decades-long grift, it's not something that just appeared out of thin air a few years ago.

What part do you find hard to believe? That tech companies would send people to speak at a university's computer science functions?

Let me give you another one you'll think I'm making up: virtual reality was a thing back in the mid- to late-90s and people were confidently hyping it up back then.

reply
> virtual reality was a thing back in the mid- to late-90

even in pop-culture, see the movie Lawnmower Man.

reply
I knew flappy bird was a bigger deal than it got credit for. Didn’t realize it was agi until just now.
reply