I noticed the exact same thing. I read the original, went back to read it again and it’s completely changed.
replyI think a stickied comment about this would be due. No idea if it's possible to call in @dang via at-name?
replyLooks like they changed the post link to a Bloomberg article instead but kept the comments thread. So I guess he’s already aware.
reply> No idea if it's possible to call in @dang via at-name?
replyNo. Email hn@ycombinator.com
The in-house or the marketing team swooped in last minute it appears
replyIt’s extraordinary how much standards have slipped. Completely rewriting a major press release that’s already been sent out, while pretending it’s ostensibly the same document would have been a major corporate scandal just 15 years ago.
replyIf anyone has the original release still up and can post it somewhere that would be grand.
replyIt is rewritten on every refresh depending on the readers mood, personality, etc.. so they're most receptive to it.
replyObviously not, but we might not be far off from that being a reality.
I don’t know. I couldn’t get past the first paragraph because it seemed like complete slop.
replyThey forgot the "hey ChatGPT, rewrite this to have better impact on the company stock" before submitting it
reply