Hm. I read that as saying that their users are writing more code with the assistance of LLMs, thus placing more stress on their systems. I do not read it as making any comment about their own practices.
replyOh you're right, I misread. They're actually blaming their customer's vibe coding on their problems. I which case I call BS
replyIn our internal metrics you can see a clear increase in PRs and CI runs in general that tracks with agentic coding adoption, and it's significant, so I absolutely buy that GitHub would be struggling to take the brunt of that without big changes
replyBut GitHub's postmortems are usually related to internal rollouts rather than traffic load
replyA charitable view might be that changing which fingers you're using to plug the holes in the dike is a lot harder when the volume of water on the other side is increasing exponentially.
reply[dead]
reply