upvote
Sounds like a job for the Linux Foundation maybe?

You don't need anyone's permission to make a distro, that's true, but if you notify Debian, Canonical, Fedora, Red Hat and Arch you're covering a very large fraction of users; way more than today's 0%. In cases like this, perfect is the enemy of the good.

reply
The Linux Foundation hasn't been about Linux (except marginally) in a long while, if ever.

The name is a misnomer.

reply
A rogue actor may create a new distro, maybe for some niche use case such as accessibility or retro gaming. After acquiring enough false (and even some real) users that the Linux Foundation accepts them as a notifiable distro maintainer, this maintainer could then pwn machines before the exploit is made public.
reply
I didn't say all distros should be notified, for that exact reason. I listed a handful of major fistros.
reply
Who gets to decide who the lucky few are?
reply
Sounds like a job for the Linux Foundation maybe?
reply
Human beings
reply
Qualified by what?
reply
Are you implying it requires expertise to figure out the ten (plus or minus a factor of two) biggest distros? I think most people that understand the context of the question can figure out pretty similar lists.
reply
Rather than the current situation, where they can pwn machines after the exploit is made public?
reply
Yes. After the exploit is made public, the window of opportunity closes quickly.
reply
Uh, there is a list, named "linux-distros", which is for this purpose (and I think it's for more than just Linux, e.g. I believe it was used for the xz vuln).

Given this was announced when backports weren't ready (and given the POC was at least opaque if not obfuscated), I'm getting the vibe fixing the vuln wasn't as high as a priority as making a media splash.

reply
From TFA:

> Note that for Linux kernel vulnerabilities, unless the reporter chooses > to bring it to the linux-distros ML, there is no heads-up to > distributions.

so, no, `linux-distros` list don't solve the problem.

reply
The impacted user count of your debian fork with custom compiled kernel would probably not be more than 1 however.
reply