The problem with speed is that they usually are very fast for first few weeks and then suddenly much slower. They did such trick when they advertised Grok 4 fast ( dropped from 200 tps to 60tps)
replyWow. That is a big drop.
replyGrok 4.1 is still 110tps. The only other model that comes close is Gemini at 85tps.
reply202.7 tok/s is only OK speed? Which providers are you using that are significantly better than that?
replyI said speed was great, Cerebas and Groq can provide better performance, likewise Fast versions of Cursor's Composer and Claude.
replyThe reported speed like benchmarks is only a reported number on paper, we'll see how it holds up in real world usage, so far OpenRouter is only reporting 73tps
for reference, it's the 2nd fastest model tracked in the "Highlights" section of https://artificialanalysis.ai/
replyYes, it's incredibly fast. Openrouter is clocking 60 tokens per second, which is on par with the likes of sonnet, opus, GPT 5.5.
replyThat section misses Cerebras and Groq which are up to 5x faster.
replyVery different tech and limitations though so wouldn’t make sense to compare 1:1 I think
reply[flagged]
replyI don't remember the source of the quote.
replyBut debating whether the models are intelligent is slim to debating whether a car can walk.
You can offload to the model a lot of work that until recently we thought requires intelligence. The more and better of those tasks the model can do, it's fair to call it intelligence*
"The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim." - Edsger Dijkstra
replyPlease elaborate.
replySome people have this strange idea that only "whatever humans do" counts as intelligence, despite the fact that a) we don't really have a clue what humans do, and b) "intelligence" is definitely not that strictly defined.
replyI think they're just trying to feel like they know some important truth that other people don't.
What does intelligence mean to you?
reply