I'm as happy to see cheap open weight models any anyone is, and I'm in Europe and certainly not cheering the US on, but that's a bunch of unfounded hyperbole you just said.
replyThat is a petty big assumption (aka bullshit) unless you have direct insight the inner workings of the big US labs. Just because it isn’t published doesn’t mean that innovation is not happening.
replyThat's an unfalsifiable assertion with no evidence to support it, while all the visible evidence we have points to stagnation and merely incremental pushes among the big proprietary model makers. Even Claude Mythos, which was 'teased' to the public was not released, is reportedly mostly a scaled-up model that takes massive compute resources to run. The polar opposite of what the Chinese labs are releasing now.
replyCan you name some tangible AI idea that came out of Chinese labs?
replyI can name thousands that came out western universities.
I see a lot of rhetoric that only the Chinese labs are contributing to AI while companies like Google and Microsoft are still pulishing their research.
Unfortunately the domain of scientific papers is cluttered with AI slop but still occasional serious paper that i find are from western labs particularly Google Research or Microsoft Research
Any of DeepSeek's recent papers which are more about efficiency and that's how their inference costs can be so low.
reply