>The Guardian needs to raise their bar on what to report and how to give readers full context
replyShould they not report on peer reviewed articles published in Science? or only report published articles that fit your priors?
Fair enough. But there's lot of faulty and wrong peer reviewed research as well. One such paper comes to mind which is probably cited some 7000+ times in other papers but itself is wrong.
replySo we can eventually classify AI models as Software experts, but not as Medical experts, why so?
replyI don't classify them as software experts either. Anyone doing so is probably not an expert themselves.
replyI take them as those code generation command line tools like create react app and such.
We can't. It's just that everyone and their dog has an interest in selling you that lie because money.
replyStochastic parrots can code yes, but that does not make them experts. Don't trust them with your life.
It’s a peer reviewed study in one of the world’s top science journals. It’s not some random person on a podcast.
reply