upvote
With the approval of the board of directors (in most cases), a company can simply create new shares and give them to whomever they like.

I would guess that this information will bother you.

If it helps, because many public company executives are compensated on earnings per share, most C level teams are incentivized to buy back shares, thus decreasing the denominator for the EPS calculation without changing fundamental economics of the company.

If this also bothers you, you should guess what Buffet says and thinks about those two dynamics, and then read up on it, and you will learn something interesting about public markets!

reply
I’m sure if eBay wanted to build 1800 brick and mortar stores they could do so for less than twenty seven billion dollars.
reply
Are they under any obligation to ground the value of their own stock or can a salesman simply claim that the "true" value of that stock is much much more than it currently seems to be?
reply
Stock is worth exactly what people will pay for it. Ebay share holders get to vote to accept or reject this deal
reply
Presumably stock market valuation is grounding?

Also, eBay shareholders can vote down the acquisition if they don't think the deal is good for them.

reply
You understand that the gamestop stock would then be owning ebay, thus be worth Ebay + Gamestops Valuation?
reply
Alright, my company MEME offers to buy Apple then for $1 plus 100% of MEME's stock, which is worth more than Apple then since it will own Apple.

If you word it like this it's just a hostile proposed change of leadership. Weird way to apply to become CEO of eBay, but sure.

reply
You can do that.

The shareholders have to vote for it, though.

reply
[flagged]
reply
They would also be owning a company that now would have +20B in debt.

They now own ebay. They would include in that math 20B in debt plus Gamestop.

This sounds like a pretty bad deal for ebay investors.

reply