> There is no reason to believe that future AI platforms won't be able to review code themselves and manage some aspects of themselves with minimal human oversight
replyThere are, IMHO, fewer reasons to believe they will be able to do that rather than not, though.
LLMs became much better at both reviewing and writing code over the last 12-18 months. Did you?
replyThe current state of the art is irrelevant. Only the first couple of time derivatives matter.
> Did you?
replyI would say I got better at both of those over the last 12-18 months. Are your skills static?
My brain got better at thinking deeper when I stopped using llms.
replyLmao why does it seem outlandish to other people? Perhaps they never thought too deeply in the first place to recognise it.
Compared to Claude or GPT 5.5? Yeah, my skills are static relative to the progress seen recently. So are yours, unless your grandpa was named von Neumann or Szilard.
reply> There is no reason to believe that future AI platforms won't be able to review code themselves and manage some aspects of themselves with minimal human oversight
replyReally? That's like someone during an economic boom saying "The economy is the worst it'll ever be. There is no reason to expect things to not continue to improve".