Or human engineers limiting AI-consumable documentation to improve job security!
replyThose people probably aren't working on anything useful anyways, so its no big deal.
replyI've found that by far the most useful websites as a programmer are also the ones most resistant to AI. This would be a huge loss for anyone vision impaired
replyWhat sorts of sites are you thinking of? To me, “most useful to a programmer” evokes docs and blogs and github issues and forum posts. I suppose some forums might be AI-resistant (login wall), but the others are trivially AI accessible.
replyPlenty of Linux-y websites use Anubis. Arch Wiki and IIRC some other distros too.
replyThat's less a value judgment, more a necessary evil due to the plethora of bad actors out there. I doubt it will get in the way of a local model used in a reasonable manner.
replyMost wikis you can mirror locally if you really need to hammer them.
GitHub is naturally LLM resistant via its new uptime feature… I’ll show myself out.
replyExamples, please.
replyThat’s such an extremely small niche of people it’s not a real risk.
reply"AI" is a made up hype thing. It's just computers and computer programs. For real!
reply