upvote

points

by xnx7 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby voidfunc6 hours ago|
[-]
Why would they stop something that a huge majority of people voted for and want?

Trump won the popular vote and if we use logic from above all the non-voters are in fact supporters as well.

reply
upvoteby piva003 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
As far as I understand the US president is not a king that governs by decree, there's a whole other branch of government also elected to represent the will of the people, a branch where negotiations, debates, voting takes place to determine how the country should be.

People voted for Trump which had as one of its key promises during election "no more wars", perhaps it's ok that the another branch of government stop something which people didn't vote for?

reply
upvoteby NDlurker4 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
Trump had 2,284,967 more votes than Harris. 77,302,580 people voted for him. That's not a huge majority of people.
reply
upvoteby tzs1 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
It is not even a majority. It was just a plurality.
reply
upvoteby watwut4 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
How come this logic does not apply to democratic politicians? Why is it that them winning election by small margin does not imply that everything they do is good and legit for conservative people like you?
reply
upvoteby Hikikomori5 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
next
[-]
Did they? Or did Trump say no more wars?
reply
upvoteby DiabloD36 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Unfortunately, there seems to be no proof he actually won the popular vote.

Trump has admitted openly that he won due to mass tampering with voting machines, and thanked Elon Musk for his help.

Your analogy falls apart.

reply
upvoteby ozlikethewizard5 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Citation needed. You lot elected him before, seems likely you elected him again. Pretended he won by cheating instead of because your democracy is in dire need of a refit will do little but alloallow the next facists to win as well.
reply
upvoteby HerbManic5 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Not OP. I believe it is from folks like this. It is compelling but it can also difficult to pin down the exact details. They rely mostly on statistics based oddities.

I do appreciate that they are not interested in over throwing the 2024 election, just ensure that any possible gaps are covered for future elections.

> The Election Truth Alliance is initiating a call for hand counts of paper voting records associated with the 2024 U.S. General Election, and is advocating for full hand counts prior to certification for all future U.S. elections.

https://electiontruthalliance.org/

reply