upvote
This might catch flak, but generalizing I would assume that the people banning things are the same people who would use excel for something where a database would be better, and if so, that is the reason Excel isn't banned on the same conditionals that would get sqlite banned.
reply
The sane thing would be to ban Excel and promote SQLite. Excel is often used for tabulated text (issue tracking) not calculations. Perfect use case for a relational db
reply
Excel is made for calculations. But if you make it hard to make a DB, people will abuse Excel as a DB.
reply
I mean, it might have been at first, but Microsoft figured out that the majority of users for lists without formulas in 1993 and they've strategized around that. IMHO, the biggest concession to this was when they added Power Query to core Excel in 2016.
reply
Excel has sheets for tables, columns and rows, primary keys (UNIQUE), foreign key references etc if you squint.

It doesn't require you use all of that properly, but it's there.

reply
or reimplement excel with sqlite as a backend :-D

BTW sqlite can run SQL queries on CSV files with relatively simple one-liner command...

reply
and excel has gui for forms
reply
Only where VBA is available. Not available for MacOs versions if I'm correct?
reply
VBA is just there for backward compatibility.

The modern alternative is to use JavaScript/TypeScript, which makes such solutions cross platform (including MacOs, web etc.):

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/dev/add-ins/overvie...

reply
I’ve worked at some organisations that have strict rules (not always strictly followed) about what can go in Excel spreadsheets, and where they have to be stored. The C drive is verboten. Some also have standards about classification and labelling of PII and sensitive data.
reply
IMO, almost any Excel more than a month old should become readonly.
reply
You should consider knock-on effects of this brilliant idea. Now there would be copies of spreadsheets younger than a month that get replicated 47 billion times, exponentially compounding the problem you're trying to solve.

This sounds like how we pass so many stupid laws. Nobody thinks about 2nd order effects.

reply
So you're saying they should further auto-delete after two or three months?
reply
3rd order effect, people copy and paste the old sheet into a new sheet, now we have worse exponential. You’re not very good at this huh.
reply
Which is very annoying and people will complain. People complaining can be then directed towards a better solution. As a bonus, mistakes will also rise, leading to further complaints, especially ones that reach higher. All this making the dogshit practice, and the idiots committing them, infinitely more visible and thus fixable.

The sheer volume of data that needs tending to may even grind certain departments to a halt! What a great opportunity! It'd appear I'm positively stellar at this!

reply
They generally cannot. But they do banish Access.
reply
Now that is different.

Access gets used for a shared DB and that is quite easy to corrupt. It is much more cost effective to have that in a proper central database (I supse SQLLite is better here as well)

reply
Excel is also a shared DB: it has supported multiple concurrent users accessing and modifying the same spreadsheet for decades.
reply
deleted
reply
Do companies ban text files? Text files are used to store data.
reply
That's why you store them in unsaved tabs instead.
reply
Do companies ban data centers? It's crazy to send PII to other computers on the line.
reply
Do companies ban brains? Brains are used to store data.
reply