You don't pay for a £200 a month account to respond to your emails, and if you are, I would tell you that you're wasting your money.
replyI don't know, I guess it depends from a) how many hours per month you spend answering emails, and b) how much more revenue you could get in that same time. $200 should be reasonably 2/3 hours of work? So that's about the amount of saved time per month to break even on your subscription. It's a steal.
replyWhenever you solve any hard problem, you start off by finding a complicated solution, which you then scale down to a simpler solution.
replyLLMs are a "complicated solution" in the sense that they're expensive. Once you know what they're capable of, you can scale them down to something less expensive. There's usually a way.
Also, an important advantage of LLMs over other approaches is that it's easy to improve them by finding better ways of prompting them. Those prompting strategies can then get hard-coded into the models to make them more efficient. Rinse and repeat. Similarly, you can produce curated data to make them better in certain areas like programming or mathematics.
they're not _compplicated_, their complex. And solution implies they're not hallucinating the goat and how to fix it.
replyDo you realize you're fighting a strawman or do you actually think this is a compelling argument?
replyoh, sorry, I'm not running a 10T param. Just local models for me. kk thx.
reply