upvote

points

by pjmlp14 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby tadfisher13 hours ago|
next
[-]
What's amazing about Linux is that you don't have to use the system's libc, and you don't have to use dynamic linking.

That said, newer Androids use seccomp to restrict which syscalls you can use, basically to what bionic exposes anyway. This doesn't seem to affect Termux and friends, which can apparently run full X11 applications without root.

(edit) Notably, splice() is still callable, so maybe the POC needs to be tweaked...

reply
upvoteby pjmlp6 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Yes, at which point it isn't GNU/Linux, rather something else built on top of the Linux kernel.

As for termux,

https://wiki.termux.com/wiki/Termux_Google_Play

reply
upvoteby stevenhuang14 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
That's all user space platform specifics, it has no relation to your previous statement where you said 'android is not linux'.

Someone can statically build a freestanding executable/so targetting arm64 linux (specifically the right android linux kernel version) and it will run fine on Android. The syscall interface, process model, file descriptors, signals, memory mapping, all of this is Linux, this is what people mean when they say Android is just Linux.

reply
upvoteby pjmlp6 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Yes, exactly PlayStore isn't GNU/Linux, normies don't use ADB.
reply
upvoteby dzaima14 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
That's specific libraries, when using the default linker. You could construct that same behavior on desktop linux too. And you can avoid it equally well on Android - you can statically-link things just fine, you can use libraries you actually control, and presumably use a custom linker if desired. It's utterly non-surprising that "you run code you don't control" results in "said code...can do arbitrary things for unsupported use". (Never mind that, instead of a "sherif", they could've just renamed all private symbols, or just naturally replaced them over time, breaking your code all the same, just in a more confusing way)

Also some obligatory Linux vs GNU/Linux comment. (and it's not like GNU/Linux doesn't ever change under your feet - see the glibc DT_HASH debacle)

reply
upvoteby esseph14 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
https://www.androidpolice.com/google-support-linux-kernels-a...

Google relies on Linux LTS kernels. When the Linux LTS team dropped support from 6 years down to 2 years, Google stepped in to cover the 4-year gap.

It is Linux. It's basically a distro.

reply
upvoteby pjmlp6 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
When people say Linux they mean GNU/Linux.
reply
upvoteby cyphar5 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
In common parlance, yes -- because there is no practical distinction. But in cases where something is just using the Linux kernel without GNU and other common userpand components (and there is a practical distinction) then it's definitionally untrue to say that it's "not Linux" if you really meant to say "it's not GNU/Linux".
reply
upvoteby nonameiguess2 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
Alpine Linux is not using GNU. I'm sure there are others. No definition you can ever come up with will have no exceptions in widespread use. Live with it.
reply
upvoteby anthk12 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
- Waydroid

- Is totally Linux

reply