If strength is relevant, should particularly weak boys be "treated like girls"?
replyShould particularly strong girls be "treated like boys"?
Should girls and women without functioning reproductive systems be treated like boys?
What differences in social roles have been proven "necessary"?
Is the fact that chimpanzees do things a certain way remotely good evidence that we should do something that way too?
Answer key:
- no
- no
- no
- which gamete you supply?
- no
I always find it really amusing that the most pro trust the science people who are in total agreement with all the evolution theories are often also the ones who are the first to be in complete denial that us humans might actually share some characteristics with our closest genetic relatives (chimpanzees).
replyBonobos are just as close and they're matriarchal. They're a very different species.
replyYes, and that’s a good point too. Pretty big difference between the sexes with them as well.
reply>the most pro trust the science people who are in total agreement with all the evolution theories
replyLike with most religions which "the science" very much qualities for at this point, there believers will just pick and choose what to believe and use to get there way.
The big idea lately is to ignore all of that and just give everyone equal rights but unequal responsibilities.
reply