upvote
Whether or not you want to admit that is up to you. If you're selling automation or efficiency gains, you're removing human labor.
reply
My first "job" in computing, where someone else paid me for code, was in a research context where we were modeling radio propagation. Nothing about that was removing human labor. It in face eventually called for a bunch of humans to interact with each other. See: https://www.hamsci.org/basic-project/2017-total-solar-eclips...

I don't think it is fair to claim computers are about putting people out of jobs.

reply
I think it is. Before computers you would have had to write all that down on paper logs. By using code, you saved yourself time. If it wasn't less labor, you wouldn't have done it that way.
reply
> Before computers

Computer used to mean "human who does math". Before machine computers, we had human computers. Machine computers replaced all of these human computers.

reply
Before it was less labor, they might not have done it at all. Computers let you do things quicker. So you do more things.
reply
Ok, then go work on homelessness or political corruption. It's not like we have a dearth of problems. Coding is solved.
reply
People *did* write down these logs, manually, and submit them.
reply
And without software, what then, make a bunch of books and mail it to all these people? On this site of all sites, it's blowing my mind that this kind of thing isn't obvious to everyone. I guess maybe it isn't if you were born before the internet, but man, I'm really surprised by some of these comments.
reply
Human labor could do the math by hand
reply
And in fact, was how it was done.
reply
Why else would one create software, if not to do something that a human does/did?
reply
To do things that a human could have done in theory, but did not do because it would have been too expensive.
reply
A few off the top of my head:

- Video games

- Medical device firmware

- Synthesizers

- Detailed universe-scale physics simulations

- Mars rover control software

- The Linux kernel

reply
- Video games - only feasible because of computers.

- Medical device firmware - hardware control layer for medical devices, which are used to aid in medical procedures.

- Synthesizers - help to make music.

- Detailed universe-scale physics simulations - help to make certain physics problems more tractable.

- Mars rover control software - helps to remote control rovers.

- The Linux kernel - control layer that sits between firmware and actual applications, pretty much just a common shared library so apps don't have to each ship with a full stack.

I don't really see your point here. None of these examples counter the argument that software is created to automate human labour as much as is practical.

Video games are an interesting category since they're entirely enabled by software: I can't imagine anyone driving a video game manually (note I don't consider things like Chess, etc software to be video games in this context; more things like FPS, racing, etc). I do remember as a kid I thought that there were actually little people doing the stuff in video games though.

reply
This list is funny.

All of these things existed in pre computer form.

A scheduler used to be a person putting punch cards into a machine.

reply
What's the human form of a video game ?
reply
Board games? All sorts of toys?
reply
Well not really, since the board game itself doesn't need a paid human to work. It's been crafted by a human, but video games are also crafted by (arguably many more) humans. The closest would be escape games, or larger scale games maybe
reply
To do new things no number of humans can do
reply
No one is taking away programming as a hobby from you :)
reply