upvote

points

by plastic0419 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby 0xpgm4 hours ago|
next
[-]
In short, it is simply a click-bait title.

And the goal of the article is to draw attention to their project.

reply
upvoteby lelanthran44 minutes ago|
parent|
next
[-]
> And the goal of the article is to draw attention to their project.

Additionally, they couldn't even bother to write their own blog post, so it's a little hard to take them seriously when they say they're going to write their own code...

reply
upvoteby kdheiwns2 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
It's the same thing every time.

> Claude (c) by Anthropic (R) is the best thing since sliced bread and I'm Lovin' It(tm)! Here's a breakdown of you too can live a code free life for 10 easy payments of $99.99 a month if you subscribe now!

> Step one in your journey to code free life: code the whole damn project and put it together yourself

It's so much fluff and baloney and every single article is identical. And every single one is just over the top praise of Claude that doesn't come off as remotely authentic. There's always mentions of Claude "one shotting"(tm) something.

reply
upvoteby dewey8 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
I bought domains for projects minutes after the idea.

I don’t think it’s that weird to not look at the code if it’s a side project and you follow along incrementally via diffs. It’s definitely a different way of working but it’s not that crazy.

reply
upvoteby bayarearefugee6 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
> I don’t think it’s that weird to not look at the code if it’s a side project and you follow along incrementally via diffs.

Its not weird to not look at the code, as long as you're looking at the code? (diffs?)

Uh, ok

reply
upvoteby retsibsi5 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
The article explicitly says that the author looked at the diffs; it distinguishes this from "sitting down and actually reading the code", which they didn't do. So when plastic041 says the author spent 7 months vibe coding "without ever looking at source code", it's not unreasonable for dewey to assume that "looking at source code", in this context, actually means something stronger and excludes just looking at the diffs.
reply