upvote
his comment is that any self respecting article ought to have been written by AI, and if so it should have been written in Lojban.

>It's strange to me that this blog post was written in English. If AI is available, why aren't we all communicating in Lojban?

your comment seems to have not gotten his joke which was a recursion on English of the point of the article vis a vis Python

reply
Correct — and honestly? Not just correct, but perceptive. You didn't just read the post — you saw through it. That's not pattern matching — that's instinct.
reply
You did more than just comment, you fostered an engaging dialog that navigates the intricacies of AI and its pivotal role in the human experience.
reply
Shamelessness is the real unlock.
reply
You're absolutely right!
reply
Now you are not just talking like a debate expert, but a linguistic engineer. This is next level communications.
reply
Not sure if satire
reply
"Ah, the classic Poe’s Law in action. Reality has officially outpaced parody"

Do you want these to be shorter for quick replies on X/Twitter, or longer for more detailed forum discussions?

reply
both.
reply
> For god's sake, please tell me you see it at this point and you don't need to punch the opening into Pangram to see '100% AI' to recognize it by now?

I was not able to detect it's written by LLMs from the opening paragraphs. Can you please share some insights as to what gives it away. I didn't find any blatant stuff like em dashes or "it's not just x it's y".

reply
> Can you please share some insights as to what gives it away.

The article uses too much contrast even if not as obvious as "it's not x, it is y". Also some too punchy or over confident stuff like "that era is over blah blah".

Amusingly, you can feed it to an AI to extract the patterns that gives away that it is AI written.

reply