Hmm do we want them to decide what stuff is shady and what isn't?
We're already allowing payment processors to do that and it's not good.
That nonetheless doesn't help them unless they are doing active MITM. In order to do that they'd have to have at least some physical presence at Cloudflare or on the path to Cloudflare.
People didn’t care when they learned about PRISM, why would they care now when it’s a known fact? The sane stance would be to assume Cloudflare is in cahoots with NSA.
The NSA leaks dominated news cycles for the entirety of 2013.
This is as helpful as Whatsapp's so called E2E encryption comms (that just happens to not be applicable by default in certain situations).
it does give better peering. reduces latency a bit for me.
but you can also see from curl or traceroute, that the endpoint you talked to was a cloudflare ip and your ssl ended there. after that you can't see inside cloudflare.
I think more people than you would expect would be happy to accept that as the price for protection against malicious actors
That doesn't mean collusion
Either way, if they were directly colluding with Google, they would have had a much simpler time siphoning off that data.