undefined

points

[-]

I caught him a few times not writing significant details that go against his narrative.

"FSD disengages just before the collision." The other video angle shows that the driver presses the brake, which disengages FSD. "Tesla consistently hides information from the court." There are two different cases separated by years. The police got all the information they needed in the first case. "FSD is 10x worse than the average driver." The uncertainty of the number due to insufficient statistics makes the comparison moot.

by adgjlsfhk16 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

"FSD disengages just before the collision." The other video angle shows that the driver presses the brake, which disengages FSD.

To be fair that's not a contradiction. If FSD is designed such that a user braking because FSD was about to plow into something, sure the user started driving at the last second, but that is Tesla making a design choice to artificially blame users for FSD being fundamentally unsafe.

by red75prime5 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

The claim was that FSD disengages before collision without user input (presumably to fool someone into thinking that it's the driver's fault). It's not clear who they are trying to fool though. The public will not buy it. NHTSA requires reporting the crash as ADAS-related if ADAS was active at any point during 5 seconds before the crash. The court would just classify this tactic as criminal negligence in the design (if they can detect imminent crash, why they disengage FSD instead of initiating emergency braking?).

All-in-all, the trick that can't fool anyone and that doesn't make any sense. If this claim was true, the only explanation would be that Tesla is evil for the sake of evil and to the detriment to itself. Evil and dumb.

On the other hand, pressing the brake is a common way of disengaging ADAS. Tesla is no better and no worse in this regard than other ADAS manufacturers.

by sidcool17 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

He is extremely negative about Tesla, consistently. He's careful not to open himself to lawsuit with plausible deniability. But he borderline lies. I won't be surprised if he's on the payroll of legacy auto

by general146515 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

I don't think he is on payroll, but he was promised Tesla Roadster, when it did not materialize he went on a vengeful crusade. I don't blame the guy, I would do the same.

by sidcool10 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

Is that legit?

by general14657 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

Yeah, he was a big Tesla shill, after he got scammed from the Roadster, he did 180 and started pointing everything wrong with Tesla

https://www.thedrive.com/news/24025/electreks-editor-in-chie...

by jfoster21 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

If you read his articles over the years you would continually think that Tesla should go out of business in the near future, yet they never do.

He might not specifically lie, but puts such a negative spin on anything Elon-related that the overall result is essentially a lie.