undefined

points

[-]

It's almost certainly ai written though. All the regular tells are there... Though he likely edited some out, like that "just"

Also if it was handwritten, it'd have been a third in length, the rest was LLM fluff

by bergheim11 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

Correct, that was my point

by ffsm855 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

I see, i actually like these tells. It let's us easily distinguish garbage from someones thoughts.

And you can also see how brainrotten someone's gotten when they start accidentally sneaking in these tells into their normal communication.

As a matter of fact, after a full workday in which I'm essentially forced to read LLM garbage for 9h a day... I sadly notice myself adding the same fluff pointlessness to how I express myself. like I caught a viral contagion that's actively siphoning my humanity away.

And expectedly, when coming back to those opinions with a less infected mindset, I frequently have to reevaluate these thoughts later on

by danparsonson8 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

Do we need to keep pointing this out though? LLMs are not going anywhere any time soon and people will keep using them to generate articles.

If the content is also nonsense then that's worth talking about, but otherwise comments about LLM style are about as interesting as remarks about typos.

by novok50 minutes ago|

parent|

[-]

Yes we do, continue keeping it a faux pas to reduce the over verbose LLM speak put elsewhere and ask people to just share the original prompt and save us all time. Label your LLM usage to respect other people's time.

by HomeDeLaPot2 hours ago|

parent|

prev|

[-]

I guess for me, blatant LLM style reminds me of LinkedIn-speak. Both are distracting and come across as fake. Somehow it's more interesting to read something in another human's unique style than to read something that's obviously been passed through a filter.