I think it would depend on the facts of the case. This one seemed a bit of a non case. Quote from a law expert in the FT which I thought good:

>the spectacle of these two multibillionaires fighting about power and money has distorted and obscured what the law is meant to care about here, which is the public interest

(https://www.ft.com/content/846479c8-4ab0-4812-a1d5-08abdd8b9...)

That's just a point about how (annoying) Sam-boosters are.