Hacker News
new
past
comments
ask
show
jobs
points
by
thesdev
11 hours ago
|
comments
by
lapetitejort
11 hours ago
|
next
[-]
Cross examination is one of the vanishingly few times you can see billionaires and executives act like human beings instead of sentient PR scripts.
reply
by
mrhottakes
10 hours ago
|
prev
|
next
[-]
It would just burn more cash unless he can somehow go back in time and change the facts.
reply
by
thesdev
8 hours ago
|
parent
|
next
[-]
If anyone can afford burning cash for his ego it's the richest man in the world with the biggest ego in the world.
reply
by
hoppyhoppy2
9 hours ago
|
parent
|
prev
|
[-]
Yes, and more burnt cash (and hopefully emotional energy) would be an acceptable outcome
reply
by
ActorNightly
3 hours ago
|
prev
|
next
[-]
There is nothing that comes out of this fight. Open AI has lost to Anthropic and Google already. And Musk needs to be in prison.
reply
by
enraged_camel
11 hours ago
|
prev
|
[-]
There's nothing to appeal. Statute of limitations is... just that.
reply
by
lowkey_
9 hours ago
|
parent
|
next
[-]
IANAL but civil statute of limitations is based on when the prosecuting party reasonably discovered they were wronged and had legal recourse, not when the event happened. It is entirely possible to debate when that was in this case.
reply
by
paulpauper
11 hours ago
|
parent
|
prev
|
[-]
For criminal cases at least, the statue of limitations is not set in stone. But probably for civil, its much more cut and dry.
reply
by
mrhottakes
10 hours ago
|
parent
|
[-]
Criminal law actually has very specific statutes of limitation as well, depending on the crime.
reply