upvote
recently there has been some football and stopgap in congress about reauthorizing the patriot act permissions for the NSA to collect any communications where one endpoint is out of the country. so that's at least widely recognized and 'legal'
reply
I covered this with: "Is there overlap? Sure."

The FBI is the boogeyman everyone around these parts wants the NSA to be. The NSA has the skillset, they just don't use it like that, domestically.

That was my point. Carry on. I don't mind if you agree or not.

reply
Intentionally collecting everything to include millions of U.S. persons data, say the collection was "incidental", put the computer equivalent of a removable sticky-note over their name to say it's been "minimized" and thus a-okay for the NSA to use...

There is a debate the bulk of NSA's leadership has been wholly uninterested in having over what they do with regards to acquiring and parsing U.S. persons' private communications, instead preferring to use word-games and rhetorical sleight-of-hand.

Everything I've seen about the NSA domestic collection debate and publishings and statements from officials have boiled down to:

*The NSA intentionally parses the private communications of millions of U.S. citizens in bulk because it's often mixed in with the communications of non-US citizens - that it isn't their intent or mission to acquire and parse U.S. persons' communications are not germane considerations. Actions matter more than words.

*The NSA justifies this by dint of "it's okay, everyone! We trust ourselves to never do anything bad with your information! We never meant to acquire it! But we did. And we will keep acquiring more of your info "incidentally" as your privacy is something we are willing to sacrifice in our efforts to acquire foreign intelligence.

*The NSA shares an enormous amount of U.S. persons' private communications with other intelligence agencies to include the FBI. Again - that it was not the NSA's intent nor mission to acquire the information to begin with is not relevant when they, nevertheless, keep getting the information!

reply
> The NSA has the skillset, they just don't use it like that, domestically.

That seems like a statement that needs backed up by sources.

reply
Fat chance. I don’t care if you believe me. I’m not lying to you.
reply
I believe you but this seems far more like HSI territory, who are comfortable, able, and excessively willing to overstep rights of both citizens and foreigners. They're also an underestimated agency that IIRC is larger than the FBI.
reply