Ouch. That's going in completely the wrong direction.
replyHow many people complain that we have too much low quality AI output for humans to read, let alone evaluate vs. how many people are complaining that they want higher quality, more trustworthy output?
Seems like the only good thing about 3.5 Flash is its speed. Not cost-competitive or benchmark-leading by any means.
replyHow do they calculate that?
reply3.1 has 57M output tokens from Intelligence Index, 3.5 Flash has 73M, so not a lot more, and 3.5 is a bit cheaper, I don't get how 3.5 can be 74% more expensive.
Only speculation but cache maybe?
reply>3.5 Flash was more expensive than 3.1 Pro to run the Artifical Analysis test suite
replyThat's everything I needed to know.
That's what I came here to check. Last model release they only put it into preview[0] at first.
replyDoes that mean this model is production ready?