upvote

points

by r_lee3 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby xyzzy_plugh2 hours ago|
next
[-]
I've managed several accounts with GCP over the years and I've always maintained a great relationship with our contacts there. Some of these accounts were quite small, on the order of <$20k/mo, and even then we were kept abreast of anything that might be cause for concern. I always maintain a standing biweekly meeting with at least someone on the other side (account exec, technical staff, whatever) and I've yet to be blindsided by anything.

Is Google's communication good? No, not particularly. The only way something like TFA happens is if the relationship is neglected (by one or both parties). I'm not saying Railway did something wrong, but there are usually many flags and opportunities to correct long before drastic actions.

I get the impression that Railway plays fast and loose with a lot of their limits and resources and that Google may not be a fan of that.

Edit: would also like to say that if you put all your resources in one GCP project you are going to have a bad time. If you organize stuff over many projects it is very unlikely that they will ever take account wide action. I've had issues with, for example, a particular tenant's behavior, but it never jeopardized the other tenants.

reply
upvoteby Avicebron2 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
> what if that happens to a small account which hosts some really important data/services there?

Pray to @dang that you will make the front page of HN?

reply
upvoteby throwaway858252 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
Even if you are a billion dollar company you still have problems like the Australian pension did. Google is just that bad.
reply
upvoteby chi_features2 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
https://blog.railway.com/p/series-b

Agreed. Railway are probably not far off a billion dollar company though!

reply
upvoteby jrockway2 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
I don't think you can ever trust one service with critical data. Some Claude instance deletes your prod database, you have to restore from an offsite backup because it also deleted your local backups. Even at small startups we did pg_dump to AWS from GCP because ... who knows what is going to happen to GCP, and we want to continue to be in business if that happens.

I don't feel safe with any one single point of failure. "Your credit card bounced", "you thought it was dev", "you got hacked", etc. are all the same problem to me and no cloud provider solves those merely by setting up an account.

reply
upvoteby ttoinou2 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
Railway isnt far from being a billion dollar company, no ?
reply