upvote
The big difference was that they lacked the market share they enjoy nowadays, with their forks and Electron crap.
reply
The cute thing about asm.js is that it was fully backwards compatible with the web: it was just a lot slower without dedicated support. So Epic or whomever could put out a demo that would run just fine in Chrome, but the performance was a lot worse than Firefox which had a dedicated compilation pipeline, so it made Chrome look bad.
reply
Exactly. "You can't not support it; you can only be slow."
reply