https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064177
It may be sick, but someone's got a sense of humor over there :)
Renting them out in part at 1.25 B pr month sounds like a very good deal for spacex.
Total investment is 20-40B, rent to Anthropic for 45B over 3 years.
Anthropic is also profitable now.
By which metrics Anthropic is making a lot of money.
At the time the consensus narrative was that SpaceX no longer needed Colossus 1 for Grok and that was why it could be leased to Anthropic while Colossus 2 would handle Grok training and inference. Does Anthropic also leasing Colossus 2 change this?
Claude is eating so much compute, the threat of that power being tuned down by lawsuit (rightfully) is worth the risk to Anthropic in the short-term. Instead of declaring "bubble", I'm just going to say that's so crazy.
https://naacp.org/articles/naacp-sues-xai-illegal-pollution-...
And then compare the $45B revenue from Anthropic to see if it's mostly break even or if one of Anthropic/SpaceX came out ahead on the contract.
So my guess on costs would be like ~$10B for Colossus 1, and Colossus 2 would be like ~20b.
While Altman got laughed out of the room as a "podcasting bro" asking for trillions in investment in compute, Dario was going on about how difficult it is to forecast capacity on the Dwarkesh podcast. Seems like a major unforced error on Dario's part. What I cannot understand is how they both came to such different perspectives; my best guess is that ChatGPT has so much more traffic that OpenAI could gauge the trends much better.
This won't hurt Anthropic long-term of course, but this won't look great on that balance sheet, that too right around the time they plan to IPO.
Stop posting stuff you have ZERO clue about.
Edit: S1 states both are being leased so the 20-25B initial investment probably more relevant