upvote
> Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

reply
Yeah was a joke as I think most cars if you drive through that your car is f'd
reply
Ironically, a properly sealed EV system would better deal with a flood. Combustion engines have issues due mostly to the air intake and exhaust.
reply
You'd need to ensure every electrical connection is in a waterproof location which I'm pretty sure is not a thing for any standard car manufacturing. Cabins are also rarely watertight.

AFAIK your best bet is a diesel with a snorkel, and hope things have dried off before you need to restart the engine.

reply
Rivan's R1T and R1S have a water fording height of ~43", standard: - https://rivian.com/support/article/what-is-the-water-fording...
reply
If cabins are water tight you risk carbon monoxide poisoning
reply
Carbon monoxide... in an EV?
reply
Are EVs typically "sealed" by default? If not, how is going through the effort to "seal" an EV different than installing snorkels for ICE cars?
reply
Some are more sealed than others, such as Rivian's R1T and R1S which have a water fording height of ~43": https://rivian.com/support/article/what-is-the-water-fording...
reply
Their account is about as old as yours.
reply
More a comment on how HN has devolved in the past 2 years, if I want snark, this isn't the place I go to find it.
reply
Really? I find more bad faith and snark on HN than anywhere else and always have.
reply
People are allowed to joke. We don't always need 'substantive comments'
reply
It's not a joke if it doesn't make any sense, what good is a snorkle on an electric car?
reply
That's...the joke. The humor is in the absurdity of recommending an addon to the car that utterly would not work and would look ridiculous. It's layered on the fact that Jeep snorkels look sort of ridiculous even on the vehicles they were designed for.
reply