The pre-trained ones no (except some of the new ones which have post training data added to pre-training for some reason). The post-trained ones yes (at least all the ones I've seen).
replySome of the niche ones I'm not sure about. Like the historical LLMs. I have not tested those yet.
I think any instruction tuned model is going to "know" it's an LLM.
replyYes. The first step of aligning each and every GPT-based LLM is to suppress the “I am human” kind of responses. It’s baked into the weights.
replyReminds me of old cleverbot conversations where it would always assert it is human and you are the bot.
replyTrained on previous conversations with people.
It's also at minimum baked into the system prompt of virtually any LLM.
replyThat's not "baked" and only applies to remotely hosted LLMs where someone else feeds the prompt into the LLM.
replyWithout a system prompt no. And in general they “know” nothing and just predict the next best word.
replyThis is wrong. See other comments.
replyFor sure, as they are stochastic parrots. My question should have been: what are the odds a llm would react properly to those instruction, but I got lazy and asked if they "know" it, because I presumed most readers here do know how llms are working.
reply