undefined

points

[-]

I do not think that self-defense of an invading force is what just war theory is concerned with. The passage also says it is outdated, not that the doctrine is abrogated.

by erelong8 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

It's true that self-defense is not the only case where arguments have been made for justification for war but I think it's the most common:

> Catholic philosophy, therefore, concedes to the State the full natural right of war, whether defensive, as in case of another's attack in force upon it; offensive (more properly, coercive), where it finds it necessary to take the initiative in the application of force; or punitive, in the infliction of punishment for evil done against itself or, in some determined cases, against others.

"War" entry: newadvent.org/cathen/15546c.htm

By calling Catholic teaching "outdated", this sounds like the heresy of modernism (even if outright "abolition" isn't mentioned) - since for example these "older" teachings are directly applicable to current conflicts (people here might support Ukraine's right to defend against Russia, for example, under theories of justifications for war)

"Modernism": https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10415a.htm