I think Elixir is a good candidate here. It's small, coherent, and composes well, and (at least to my understanding) the authors consider the language finished, with no new major features planned.
replyElixir is missing static types though, it's hard to go back to work on dynamic languages.
replyHopefully, it's coming.
replyhttps://elixir-lang.org/blog/2023/06/22/type-system-updates-...
I'd particularly like examples of statically typed languages that "got it right" (since I love me my types)
replyOcaml maybe? Multi threading didn't seem necessary and introduced the possibility of data races.
replyThat’s whataboutism - no language is perfect, but given when go released it’s fair to hold them to a higher standard than languages what were designed 25 years earlier.
replyAs an aside - D, Zig, Rust, even typescript got most of the lessons learned from C right
I'm not familiar with D, but Zig and Rust are well-known for continuously evolving.
replyZig has the (in)famous "Writergate": https://github.com/ziglang/zig/pull/24329
And besides Rust's high count of RFCs, there are things like async (I'm not complaining about it, but its an obvious large-scale "change"), module system changes, etc.
(To be clear, I like both languages a lot. But I wouldn't call them slow moving or right from the start.)
D literally can't even maintain backwards compatibility between minor version updates not to mention a big part of the D community left when D reinvented itself with D2. Among languages it's probably the one that is constantly in a state of flux.
replywhat's a big project built with D? I feel it gets mentioned a lot on hackernews but I've never run into any project using it in the wild.
reply[dead]
reply