upvote
Well, yes, but here the Pareto principle comes to mind, though.
reply
AI psychosis just a lazy term, much like Trump Derangement Syndrome.

It sounds hostile while also removing any scope for productive discourse.

Once you call someone a 'psycho', they are less likely to engage with you, and more likely to double down on their views.

reply
It’s absolutely lazy, because it’s not psychosis.
reply
It might be psychosis.

> Psychosis is the term for a collection of symptoms that happen when a person has trouble telling the difference between what’s real and what’s not[0]

For many seemingly intelligent, rational, competent humans AI has become a layer between them and reality that has absolutely sabotaged their ability to know what is real.

[0] https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/symptoms/23012-psychos...

reply
There probably are a non-zero number of people in the world who are afflicted with real-live AI psychosis.

For everyone else, that term is being applied with disingenuous levels of incompetence.

reply
It's a subtlety of context that distinguishes hyperbole from delusion...
reply
It's psychosis in the sense that it's a strong feeling at odds with reality.

And I wonder how many CEOs believe these LLMs are truly sentient and truly friendly and supportive.

reply
Correct, it's addiction.
reply
The problem is, most of us are not psychologists and don't know enough to accurately diagnose somebody. But we can definitely see when someone is acting crazy.
reply
I'm not sure that's a good term either, unless we're also saying that nail guns and microwaves are addictions.
reply
It's not. Believe it or not, words mean things.
reply
Seems like privilege to soften the term only now that we are talking about CEOs.
reply
You're claiming that the person you replied to changed tune when we started talking about CEOs?
reply
It has always been ok to talk about psychosis in the general public, known as a "mass psychosis". Why is that suddenly a problem for CEOs?
reply
I saw that psychosis happening in real time with a coworker. It absolutely is a real phenomenon. After a while, he started presenting ChatGPT's replies as the absolute truth.

I don't think there ever has been something that can _answer_ you back and reinforce your delusion. This is a new thing.

reply
As a longtime student of the human condition, it is so obvious to me that this is real, has been happening, and will continue to happen as long as homo sapiens (in our current state) exists.

False beliefs are not a neutral thing to ignore. The way people react to them has strikingly tangible consequences for the rest of us.

A frightening number of people already believe all kinds of wildly irrational things about AI, and I don't see any way this doesn't become an increasingly complex issue we will all continue to have to deal with for the rest of our lives. In addition to everyone who comes after us.

reply
It’s a real phenomenon that gets lazily slapped onto anyone using AI poorly.
reply
It's also a great way to dampen the massive bipartisan moment against AI. Just attack your critics, attack their arguments, and do nothing to better the lives of people.
reply
I think the bipartisan moment against AI is in large part (surprise, surprise) optics. In reality, the powers that be may have already set their sights on AI as the next "too big to fail" industry due to a perceived economic threat from China.
reply